Dr. White reviews the relevant case materials — autopsy reports, toxicology, medical records, scene investigation reports, and photographs — and provides a written opinion addressing:

If you are evaluating whether a case has merit, or whether the forensic evidence will support your current theory, Dr. White is available for an initial free consultation before formal retention. He will give you a candid assessment of what the pathology shows and whether it can withstand scrutiny.

This conversation saves time on both sides. If the science does not support the case, it is better to know early.

After discussing the case details with the attorney, and upon attorney request, Dr. White prepares carefully crafted reports detailing his expert opinions backed by current medical and scientific knowledge. His reports are written in a style that explains complex medical issues in simple language, understandable by for judges, juries and opposing counsel.

Dr. White prepares thoroughly for every deposition. He is familiar with the record, clear about the limits of the evidence, and composed under questioning. He does not speculate beyond the findings and does not become combative when pressed.

His approach in deposition is the same as in his written opinions: accurate, direct, and grounded in the science.

Dr. White has testified virtually/remote in numerous depositions and is comfortable with the remote meeting technologies.

Dr. White's trial testimony is consistent with his deposition testimony. He explains forensic and pathological findings — how autopsies are performed, how cause of death is determined, wound mechanics, postmortem changes, anatomy — in language that is accessible without being reductive.

He does not lecture nor perform. He explains what the evidence shows and answers questions directly. Jurors tend to find him credible because his manner in testimony matches what he actually knows.